# \#meta-mender

**URL:** https://hub.mender.io/tag/meta-mender/373.md

[Latest](https://hub.mender.io/latest.md) · [Categories](https://hub.mender.io/categories.md) · [Tags](https://hub.mender.io/tags.md)

---

## [Mender-Jetson Orin NX: keep \`/data\` on UDA](https://hub.mender.io/t/mender-jetson-orin-nx-keep-data-on-uda/8340)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@chrisg](https://hub.mender.io/u/chrisg)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [July 30, 2026, 11:06am UTC](https://hub.mender.io/t/mender-jetson-orin-nx-keep-data-on-uda/8340 "2026-07-30T11:06:28Z")

</div>

Hi all. We are using Mender on Jetson Orin NX devices with Yocto / JetPack 6 (some devices were originally using JetPack 5 that was then bumped to JetPack 6). We already have a fleet of almost 1000 devices where the pers…

---

## [In Yocto mender-artifact has QA issues](https://hub.mender.io/t/in-yocto-mender-artifact-has-qa-issues/8073)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@zsolt.tomis](https://hub.mender.io/u/zsolt.tomis)\
**Replies:** 1\
**Last updated:** [October 30, 2025, 10:19am UTC](https://hub.mender.io/t/in-yocto-mender-artifact-has-qa-issues/8073 "2025-10-30T10:19:25Z")

</div>

Hi all, Installing mender-artifact on the target image and into the SDK during Yocto build results in QA issues. mender-artifact installed to the target image by: IMAGE\_INSTALL:append = " mender-artifact" Native me…

---

## [Mender-repopulate-inactive-partition breaks squashfs](https://hub.mender.io/t/mender-repopulate-inactive-partition-breaks-squashfs/7929)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@rcernea](https://hub.mender.io/u/rcernea)\
**Replies:** 3\
**Last updated:** [August 1, 2025, 6:38pm UTC](https://hub.mender.io/t/mender-repopulate-inactive-partition-breaks-squashfs/7929 "2025-08-01T18:38:07Z")

</div>

Hi, It seems this issue is present in the kirkstone branch. The commit 24d2fe0c adds the line below in the file meta-mender/meta-mender-core/classes/mender-part-images.bbclass: if \[ “${ARTIFACTIMG\_FSTYPE}” = “squashfs”…

---

## [Support for Yocto 5.2 - walnascar](https://hub.mender.io/t/support-for-yocto-5-2-walnascar/7930)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@jainvikas8](https://hub.mender.io/u/jainvikas8)\
**Replies:** 1\
**Last updated:** [July 31, 2025, 9:40am UTC](https://hub.mender.io/t/support-for-yocto-5-2-walnascar/7930 "2025-07-31T09:40:14Z")

</div>

@TheYoctoJester Considering styhead is EOL, do we have the support for walnascar, please? Thanks

---

## [Is meta-mender 'scarthgap' stable enough to migrate from 'kirkstone'?](https://hub.mender.io/t/is-meta-mender-scarthgap-stable-enough-to-migrate-from-kirkstone/7329)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@nomtor0204](https://hub.mender.io/u/nomtor0204)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [November 16, 2024, 1:10pm UTC](https://hub.mender.io/t/is-meta-mender-scarthgap-stable-enough-to-migrate-from-kirkstone/7329 "2024-11-16T13:10:46Z")

</div>

Hello, Is the meta-mender branch “scarthgap” stable enough at this point? I’m trying to decide whether I should stick with “kirkstone” until “scarthgap” becomes stable or migrate to “scarthgap” now. I couldn’t find any…