# \#feature-request **URL:** https://hub.mender.io/tag/feature-request/94.md [Latest](https://hub.mender.io/latest.md) · [Categories](https://hub.mender.io/categories.md) · [Tags](https://hub.mender.io/tags.md) --- ## [\[Feature Request\] Support for comma-separated no\_proxy envrionment variables](https://hub.mender.io/t/feature-request-support-for-comma-separated-no-proxy-envrionment-variables/8374)
**Author:** [@Carl1509](https://hub.mender.io/u/Carl1509)\ **Replies:** 0\ **Last updated:** [September 28, 2026, 8:58am UTC](https://hub.mender.io/t/feature-request-support-for-comma-separated-no-proxy-envrionment-variables/8374 "2026-09-28T08:58:06Z")
Hey, we are using Mender alongside other services on devices at customer sites. When a customer needs a proxy, we’d like a single, centralized configuration file with the proxy-related environment variables that we inje… --- ## [Extend mender-configure to dictionarys and arrays instead of simple key-value pairs](https://hub.mender.io/t/extend-mender-configure-to-dictionarys-and-arrays-instead-of-simple-key-value-pairs/4147)
**Author:** [@timo.baenziger](https://hub.mender.io/u/timo.baenziger)\ **Replies:** 4\ **Last updated:** [July 3, 2026, 8:59am UTC](https://hub.mender.io/t/extend-mender-configure-to-dictionarys-and-arrays-instead-of-simple-key-value-pairs/4147 "2026-07-03T08:59:09Z")
Does somebody know if it is somehow possible (or planned) to have dictionaries or arrays as value in the configuration JSON? From my point of view, the whole process and backend should be able to support it, because as … --- ## [Feature Request: Logs for successful deployments](https://hub.mender.io/t/feature-request-logs-for-successful-deployments/8261)
**Author:** [@fce](https://hub.mender.io/u/fce)\ **Replies:** 3\ **Last updated:** [May 21, 2026, 2:35pm UTC](https://hub.mender.io/t/feature-request-logs-for-successful-deployments/8261 "2026-05-21T14:35:52Z")
Hi, I would be curious to know about the deployments logs. Are the only ones to have this need or maybe there are technical limitations that make it unfeasible ? Thanks to the whole team in advance, Context Hosted me… --- ## [Pending deployments for not active devices](https://hub.mender.io/t/pending-deployments-for-not-active-devices/8276)
**Author:** [@pep](https://hub.mender.io/u/pep)\ **Replies:** 1\ **Last updated:** [May 21, 2026, 1:50pm UTC](https://hub.mender.io/t/pending-deployments-for-not-active-devices/8276 "2026-05-21T13:50:05Z")
Dear Mender, Is it possible to add a “pending” software deployment in the device information overview when the device has not been online? Now when I select pending it says: “If this device is part of a pending or sched… --- ## [Feature Request: Factory Reset request on Deployments](https://hub.mender.io/t/feature-request-factory-reset-request-on-deployments/8262)
**Author:** [@fce](https://hub.mender.io/u/fce)\ **Replies:** 2\ **Last updated:** [May 7, 2026, 10:03am UTC](https://hub.mender.io/t/feature-request-factory-reset-request-on-deployments/8262 "2026-05-07T10:03:28Z")
Hi, I would like to seek the community opinions regarding one feature. It is mostly architectural, and I ask just because of encountering it, now more than once in company-made internal OTA systems, and seeing it being… --- ## [\[Feature Request\] Mender CLI, using primary ID selected in Mender Settings](https://hub.mender.io/t/feature-request-mender-cli-using-primary-id-selected-in-mender-settings/7587)
**Author:** [@marvinosswald](https://hub.mender.io/u/marvinosswald)\ **Replies:** 2\ **Last updated:** [April 3, 2025, 1:02pm UTC](https://hub.mender.io/t/feature-request-mender-cli-using-primary-id-selected-in-mender-settings/7587 "2025-04-03T13:02:29Z")
Hi all, we are using a property ID as the leading Identifier for our devices. We have set the UI to use it as the leading identifier which works nicely. For everything but mender-cli because there we can only use the me… --- ## [Setting artifact description from the artifact uploader github action](https://hub.mender.io/t/setting-artifact-description-from-the-artifact-uploader-github-action/7550)
**Author:** [@DanLipsitt](https://hub.mender.io/u/DanLipsitt)\ **Replies:** 2\ **Last updated:** [February 12, 2025, 7:21pm UTC](https://hub.mender.io/t/setting-artifact-description-from-the-artifact-uploader-github-action/7550 "2025-02-12T19:21:33Z")
It would be useful to have a description parameter for the artifact uploader github action that gets passed through to the http api. --- ## [\[Feature request\] Signed configure](https://hub.mender.io/t/feature-request-signed-configure/5117)
**Author:** [@Aalex](https://hub.mender.io/u/Aalex)\ **Replies:** 1\ **Last updated:** [July 15, 2022, 9:18am UTC](https://hub.mender.io/t/feature-request-signed-configure/5117 "2022-07-15T09:18:01Z")
I do understand that the configure service uses the deployment mechanism to apply the configuration and therefore can not work when signed artifacts are activated. A nice way to overcome this problem would be a field wh… --- ## [\[Feature request\] list outages of single device](https://hub.mender.io/t/feature-request-list-outages-of-single-device/2295)
**Author:** [@genedupre](https://hub.mender.io/u/genedupre)\ **Replies:** 0\ **Last updated:** [August 7, 2020, 3:07pm UTC](https://hub.mender.io/t/feature-request-list-outages-of-single-device/2295 "2020-08-07T15:07:44Z")
Hi all, i use an inventory item to display when a device stopt responding, more specifically when the power has been removed. and its basically something like this root@localhost:/var/lib/ansible# last | grep -E ‘down… --- ## [\[Feature request\] "smart" (i.e. rules-based) device groups](https://hub.mender.io/t/feature-request-smart-i-e-rules-based-device-groups/1839)
**Author:** [@guillaumekh](https://hub.mender.io/u/guillaumekh)\ **Replies:** 4\ **Last updated:** [April 29, 2020, 10:15am UTC](https://hub.mender.io/t/feature-request-smart-i-e-rules-based-device-groups/1839 "2020-04-29T10:15:02Z")
The UI should allow the creation of “smart groups” of devices. These would be defined not by a fixed array of devices, but by a set of rules (e.g. device\_type ~= “raspberry” AND mender\_client\_version == “2.2.0”). This w… --- ## [\[Feature request\] Bulk dismiss](https://hub.mender.io/t/feature-request-bulk-dismiss/1807)
**Author:** [@dbensoussan](https://hub.mender.io/u/dbensoussan)\ **Replies:** 2\ **Last updated:** [April 21, 2020, 12:30pm UTC](https://hub.mender.io/t/feature-request-bulk-dismiss/1807 "2020-04-21T12:30:56Z")
Hi, There is a bulk accept button in the devices list, it would also be great to have a dismiss. I don’t see any risk since the device can show up later and can be pretty useful in development. Thanks! --- ## [Module update - poll inventory after successful update](https://hub.mender.io/t/module-update-poll-inventory-after-successful-update/920)
**Author:** [@speeltronics](https://hub.mender.io/u/speeltronics)\ **Replies:** 10\ **Last updated:** [August 19, 2019, 7:45am UTC](https://hub.mender.io/t/module-update-poll-inventory-after-successful-update/920 "2019-08-19T07:45:17Z")
I noticed that after a successful module update, the devices inventory on the production server still shows the old artifact until the device does its next inventory poll. Is there a way to force the device to do an inve…